Evaluating Local Language Models for Coding 2: Bonsai vs Strata

Reviews

Models used: Strata ran Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S; Bonsai ran Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-PQ2_0.gguf.

In this coding task, Strata passed independent acceptance after three rounds totaling 83.96 minutes; Bonsai still needed changes after four rounds totaling 328.50 minutes.

The main gap was in closing the engineering loop: Strata addressed feedback and completed a real run; Bonsai repeatedly missed reported issues, with eight acceptance issues remaining despite 43 passing tests. Passing tests must be followed by a working system and a complete handoff.

This is a single-task observation. Timings cover only Pi process wall time, excluding manual preparation, data repair, waiting, and independent acceptance; Strata’s final round used input repaired by Codex.

Per-round timings and acceptance results for Bonsai and Strata (in Chinese)

Engineering quality comparison of Bonsai and Strata (in Chinese)

The workflow uses Codinator as the harness between Codex and local models.

Comments

Sign in with GitHub to leave a comment. Chinese and English versions share this discussion.